ience as a concept, process, or even industry, but people only “love scien… 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13), and vaccines are safe (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). When anti-science advocates disbelieve these consensuses, they base it on the idea that scientific institutions “got it wrong” or are “hiding the truth from people” (e.g. hiding the cure for cancer from the public or working with Monsanto to suppress the dangers of GMO’s). Very few people oppose science as a concept, process, or even industry, but people only “love scien…
Or, like everything else, has been corrupted by monied interest. Got enough money and a “scientific” study will say about damn thing you want it to. Does Monsanto have any interest in scientific studies on the safety of GMOS? I mean come on! The way that creepy corporation is so gaga for the GMOS there is absolutely no way any scientist would dare conduct a study that didn’t conclude that they were absolutely 100% safe. Same with the vaccines.
It’s not about believing in science. It is about not believing in the integrity of the corporations which bankroll scientific studies.
This does not make one “anti-science” it makes you anti-special interests who manipulate scientific studies to achieve a certain outcome.